Why you might want to redeem your Bitcoin from THORChain’s lending service

Follow Frank at X.

Two days ago, the atebites X account pointed this out THORchain’s lending service Currently there is nowhere near Bitcoin to pay off its creditors.

As of the time of the post, the total amount of bitcoins to repay depositors was 1,604, while the lending pool had only 592 bitcoins.

as Shahzan Meredia, founder of Lava As explained in a post on X, when you borrow on THORchain, they sell the bitcoins you put up as collateral for your own token, RUNE. When you pay off your loan, they sell the RUNE for Bitcoin to give you back your collateral.

The actual mechanics of how this works are a bit more complicated and are detailed on THORChain’s website.

Check out the screenshots from the website below:

The main issue in this scenario is that half of the value borrowed in US dollar values ​​was borrowed when Bitcoin traded at significantly lower prices than what Bitcoin trades at today. According to Atbites.

This means that for THORchain to meet its current demands, it will need to mint upwards of 24 million RUNE (as of January 8). While it will be only about 8% Circulating supply of RUNEThis will decrease the value of the asset, giving THORchain less purchasing power as they try to buy back bitcoins on behalf of their creditors.

If traders start shorting RUNE on top of this, THORChain’s ability to buy enough Bitcoin to pay off its creditors will be further reduced.

This can lead to something similar Terra/Luna Death Circle We saw in 2022.

Additionally, Eric Voorhees, the project’s lead backer, shared that THORChain’s lending service is working as intended and that there are no threats:

A core developer for THORchain known as Nine Realms on X also made the case that THORchain is resilient:

With all that said, if you still feel uneasy about giving THORChain your Bitcoin as collateral for a loan, you might want to redeem it. If I was using the service, I would.

This article is a take. The views expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.

Leave a Comment